#1 Massachusetts (18-4)

avg: 2259.1  •  sd: 48.65  •  top 16/20: 100%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
79 Florida** Win 13-3 1947.88 Ignored Jan 31st Florida Warm Up 2025
19 Georgia Loss 10-11 1767.49 Jan 31st Florida Warm Up 2025
38 Utah State Win 10-8 1895.29 Jan 31st Florida Warm Up 2025
36 Michigan Win 13-7 2210.31 Feb 1st Florida Warm Up 2025
20 Vermont Win 13-8 2354.24 Feb 1st Florida Warm Up 2025
43 Virginia Tech** Win 13-4 2212.2 Ignored Feb 1st Florida Warm Up 2025
4 Carleton College Loss 10-13 1875.16 Feb 2nd Florida Warm Up 2025
15 Washington University Win 13-9 2370.2 Feb 2nd Florida Warm Up 2025
21 Georgia Tech Win 11-9 2104 Mar 1st Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
31 Minnesota Win 13-4 2313.47 Mar 1st Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
28 Pittsburgh Win 15-8 2329.54 Mar 1st Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
13 Texas Win 13-12 2095.85 Mar 1st Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
4 Carleton College Win 15-13 2417.48 Mar 2nd Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
3 North Carolina Loss 14-15 2081.12 Mar 2nd Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
20 Vermont Win 15-10 2311.68 Mar 2nd Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
14 California Win 13-8 2465.39 Mar 29th Easterns 2025
49 North Carolina State** Win 13-5 2164.8 Ignored Mar 29th Easterns 2025
18 Northeastern Win 13-5 2495.7 Mar 29th Easterns 2025
25 Penn State Win 13-5 2427.38 Mar 29th Easterns 2025
2 Colorado Loss 12-15 1932.39 Mar 30th Easterns 2025
5 Oregon Win 15-11 2574.8 Mar 30th Easterns 2025
17 Tufts Win 15-8 2461.82 Mar 30th Easterns 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)