#150 Kentucky (7-5)

avg: 1052.26  •  sd: 77.75  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
200 Akron Win 13-4 1413.12 Mar 15th Spring Spook
300 Cincinnati -B Win 8-6 677.47 Mar 15th Spring Spook
200 Akron Win 15-6 1413.12 Mar 16th Spring Spook
315 Wright State** Win 15-3 890.74 Ignored Mar 16th Spring Spook
99 Oberlin Loss 7-14 683.21 Mar 16th Spring Spook
39 Cincinnati Loss 8-15 1065.23 Mar 29th Huck Finn 2025
72 Southern Illinois-Edwardsville Loss 7-12 876.1 Mar 29th Huck Finn 2025
90 Missouri S&T Loss 8-12 854.16 Mar 29th Huck Finn 2025
100 Missouri Win 10-9 1390.35 Mar 29th Huck Finn 2025
135 Mississippi State Loss 10-12 873.16 Mar 30th Huck Finn 2025
194 Saint Louis Win 10-9 977 Mar 30th Huck Finn 2025
154 Macalester Win 8-6 1343.43 Mar 30th Huck Finn 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)