#128 SUNY-Binghamton (7-13)

avg: 1128.07  •  sd: 67.56  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
69 Auburn Loss 3-10 828.39 Feb 22nd Easterns Qualifier 2025
64 James Madison Loss 6-13 857.38 Feb 22nd Easterns Qualifier 2025
63 Notre Dame Loss 10-13 1131.32 Feb 22nd Easterns Qualifier 2025
27 South Carolina Loss 9-12 1434.23 Feb 22nd Easterns Qualifier 2025
96 Appalachian State Loss 6-10 778.26 Feb 23rd Easterns Qualifier 2025
183 Kennesaw State Win 14-9 1364.61 Feb 23rd Easterns Qualifier 2025
102 Syracuse Loss 12-13 1135.39 Feb 23rd Easterns Qualifier 2025
176 Ithaca Win 13-4 1532.06 Mar 22nd Salt City Classic
301 Rensselaer Polytech** Win 13-4 976.06 Ignored Mar 22nd Salt City Classic
80 Rochester Loss 7-8 1215.49 Mar 22nd Salt City Classic
73 Williams Loss 6-11 838.4 Mar 22nd Salt City Classic
153 Carleton University Loss 13-14 920.56 Mar 23rd Salt City Classic
102 Syracuse Loss 8-13 764.23 Mar 23rd Salt City Classic
75 Carnegie Mellon Loss 9-10 1246.25 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
132 Rutgers Win 8-7 1241.55 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
101 Yale Loss 8-13 766.32 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
177 Towson Win 15-4 1525.57 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
174 Delaware Win 9-7 1217.34 Mar 30th East Coast Invite 2025
101 Yale Win 13-8 1758.64 Mar 30th East Coast Invite 2025
116 West Chester Loss 5-9 663.11 Mar 30th East Coast Invite 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)