#203 Nebraska (6-5)

avg: 786.47  •  sd: 135.39  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
225 John Brown Loss 6-7 574.24 Feb 22nd Dust Bowl 2025
188 Oklahoma State Loss 10-11 738.82 Feb 22nd Dust Bowl 2025
194 Saint Louis Loss 5-13 252 Feb 22nd Dust Bowl 2025
287 Oklahoma Win 10-6 920.15 Feb 22nd Dust Bowl 2025
267 Texas Tech Win 9-7 822.22 Feb 23rd Dust Bowl 2025
395 Grinnell-B** Win 13-0 -431.78 Ignored Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
331 Minnesota-C Win 13-5 831.6 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
156 Wisconsin-La Crosse Loss 9-13 599.68 Mar 29th Old Capitol Open 2025
250 Illinois State Win 13-6 1212.58 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
216 Minnesota-Duluth Loss 12-13 616.78 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
265 St John's (Minnesota) Win 11-5 1152.99 Mar 30th Old Capitol Open 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)