#91 Cal Poly-SLO-B (8-5)

avg: 1290.22  •  sd: 76.5  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
12 British Columbia** Loss 2-13 1371.97 Ignored Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
55 UCLA Loss 5-13 935.24 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
33 California-Santa Barbara Loss 5-13 1060.93 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
332 San Diego State-B** Win 13-2 823.83 Ignored Feb 1st Pres Day Quals men
137 California-Santa Cruz-B Win 10-8 1356.8 Feb 1st Pres Day Quals men
114 California-Irvine Win 12-8 1638.45 Feb 1st Pres Day Quals men
208 UCLA-B Win 12-8 1206.45 Feb 2nd Pres Day Quals men
42 Stanford Loss 9-11 1368.16 Feb 2nd Pres Day Quals men
215 Nevada-Reno Win 13-6 1344.04 Feb 8th Stanford Open Mens
304 Cal State-Long Beach** Win 13-4 962.79 Ignored Feb 8th Stanford Open Mens
118 British Columbia -B Loss 9-11 936.81 Feb 9th Stanford Open Mens
233 Portland Win 13-6 1265.63 Feb 9th Stanford Open Mens
106 San Diego State Win 12-7 1750.59 Feb 9th Stanford Open Mens
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)