#6 North Carolina (10-1)

avg: 1775.39  •  sd: 163.01  •  top 16/20: 98.6%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
30 Duke Win 15-8 1833.62 Jan 25th Carolina Kickoff 2025
73 Emory** Win 15-0 1158.25 Ignored Jan 25th Carolina Kickoff 2025
100 Emory-B** Win 15-0 498.64 Ignored Jan 25th Carolina Kickoff 2025
85 North Carolina-B** Win 15-1 1039.03 Ignored Jan 25th Carolina Kickoff 2025
47 Appalachian State** Win 15-5 1644.53 Jan 26th Carolina Kickoff 2025
55 North Carolina State** Win 15-0 1565.2 Ignored Jan 26th Carolina Kickoff 2025
70 Alabama-Huntsville** Win 13-1 1230.53 Ignored Feb 15th Queen City Tune Up 2025
63 Case Western Reserve** Win 13-1 1383.26 Ignored Feb 15th Queen City Tune Up 2025
33 Minnesota Win 13-4 1795.72 Feb 15th Queen City Tune Up 2025
17 Vermont Win 8-3 2090.87 Feb 16th Queen City Tune Up 2025
2 Tufts Loss 6-11 1558.99 Feb 16th Queen City Tune Up 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)