#119 Yale (4-8)

avg: 1181.21  •  sd: 83.16  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
167 Colby Win 5-2 1436.35 Mar 1st Garden State 2025
217 Cornell-B** Win 5-1 1037.77 Ignored Mar 1st Garden State 2025
178 New Hampshire Win 4-2 1254.98 Mar 1st Garden State 2025
69 Rochester Loss 1-5 986.57 Mar 1st Garden State 2025
158 Massachusetts Loss 3-4 757.78 Mar 2nd Garden State 2025
81 Wellesley Loss 2-3 1341.26 Mar 2nd Garden State 2025
80 Carnegie Mellon Loss 7-10 1085.88 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
56 Maryland Loss 8-9 1573.67 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
106 Temple Loss 9-10 1137.45 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
30 Wisconsin** Loss 3-15 1422.97 Ignored Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
76 Columbia Win 5-4 1632.91 Mar 30th East Coast Invite 2025
102 Lehigh Loss 6-12 696.95 Mar 30th East Coast Invite 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)