#116 Montana (7-11)

avg: 1112.89  •  sd: 83.28  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
187 Colorado Mines Win 7-1 1178.65 Mar 9th Big Sky Brawl 2024
60 Utah State Loss 3-8 909.14 Mar 9th Big Sky Brawl 2024
67 Nevada-Reno Loss 3-11 839.92 Mar 9th Big Sky Brawl 2024
171 Montana State Win 7-5 1082.73 Mar 10th Big Sky Brawl 2024
67 Nevada-Reno Loss 4-8 875.11 Mar 10th Big Sky Brawl 2024
171 Montana State Win 7-5 1082.73 Mar 10th Big Sky Brawl 2024
171 Montana State Win 13-3 1354.59 Mar 30th Big Sky Slumber Party 2024
171 Montana State Win 10-8 1017.25 Mar 30th Big Sky Slumber Party 2024
11 Brigham Young** Loss 2-13 1656.04 Ignored Apr 13th Big Sky D I Womens Conferences 2024
25 Utah** Loss 3-13 1286.02 Ignored Apr 13th Big Sky D I Womens Conferences 2024
60 Utah State Loss 6-11 962.45 Apr 13th Big Sky D I Womens Conferences 2024
171 Montana State Win 10-3 1354.59 Apr 13th Big Sky D I Womens Conferences 2024
11 Brigham Young** Loss 5-13 1656.04 Ignored May 4th Northwest D I College Womens Regionals 2024
10 Washington** Loss 4-13 1658.08 Ignored May 4th Northwest D I College Womens Regionals 2024
154 Oregon State Win 11-7 1326.21 May 4th Northwest D I College Womens Regionals 2024
4 Oregon** Loss 3-13 1969.05 Ignored May 4th Northwest D I College Womens Regionals 2024
25 Utah** Loss 5-13 1286.02 Ignored May 5th Northwest D I College Womens Regionals 2024
13 Victoria** Loss 2-13 1553.37 Ignored May 5th Northwest D I College Womens Regionals 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)