#240 American-B (2-9)

avg: -27.07  •  sd: 139.13  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
38 American** Loss 0-13 1123.68 Ignored Mar 2nd Cherry Blossom Classic 2024
200 Towson Loss 2-10 -151.99 Mar 2nd Cherry Blossom Classic 2024
156 George Washington** Loss 1-10 240.57 Ignored Mar 3rd Cherry Blossom Classic 2024
219 William & Mary-B Loss 0-11 -316.99 Mar 3rd Cherry Blossom Classic 2024
207 Messiah Loss 2-12 -222.04 Mar 3rd Cherry Blossom Classic 2024
151 North Carolina-B** Loss 2-9 267.95 Ignored Apr 13th Atlantic Coast Dev Womens Conferences 2024
219 William & Mary-B Loss 5-7 -45.13 Apr 13th Atlantic Coast Dev Womens Conferences 2024
229 Virginia-B Win 5-3 578.16 Apr 13th Atlantic Coast Dev Womens Conferences 2024
217 Georgetown-B Loss 4-10 -307.32 Apr 14th Atlantic Coast Dev Womens Conferences 2024
151 North Carolina-B** Loss 0-9 267.95 Ignored Apr 14th Atlantic Coast Dev Womens Conferences 2024
219 William & Mary-B Win 4-3 408.01 Apr 14th Atlantic Coast Dev Womens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)