#64 South Carolina (5-7)

avg: 1634.67  •  sd: 101.79  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
2 Carleton College** Loss 1-13 2398.57 Ignored Feb 15th Queen City Tune Up 2025
67 Florida Win 9-8 1727.63 Feb 15th Queen City Tune Up 2025
27 Northeastern Loss 6-13 1492.61 Feb 15th Queen City Tune Up 2025
82 Case Western Reserve Win 7-1 2045.74 Feb 16th Queen City Tune Up 2025
31 Pittsburgh Loss 3-10 1414.51 Feb 16th Queen City Tune Up 2025
70 Connecticut Win 10-1 2168.1 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
33 Cornell Loss 7-11 1501.62 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
106 Temple Win 14-5 1862.45 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
112 West Chester Win 12-5 1813.67 Mar 29th East Coast Invite 2025
32 Georgetown Loss 8-14 1470.98 Mar 30th East Coast Invite 2025
56 Maryland Loss 7-10 1309 Mar 30th East Coast Invite 2025
47 Wesleyan Loss 4-8 1256.15 Mar 30th East Coast Invite 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)