#50 Liberty (7-4)

avg: 1017.03  •  sd: 100.18  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
28 Georgetown Loss 9-10 1157.35 Jan 25th Winta Binta Vinta 2025
14 Virginia Loss 4-10 1016.52 Jan 25th Winta Binta Vinta 2025
71 North Carolina-Wilmington Win 11-2 1215 Jan 25th Winta Binta Vinta 2025
48 James Madison Loss 7-8 912.86 Jan 26th Winta Binta Vinta 2025
107 Virginia-B** Win 13-0 600 Ignored Jan 26th Winta Binta Vinta 2025
59 Penn State Loss 6-7 740.19 Jan 26th Winta Binta Vinta 2025
68 Davenport Win 10-3 1265.49 Feb 15th 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 1
86 Tennessee Win 10-7 787.56 Feb 15th 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 1
99 Virginia Tech** Win 8-3 548.01 Ignored Feb 15th 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 1
103 Catholic** Win 11-1 305.88 Ignored Feb 16th 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 1
92 Richmond** Win 6-2 784.91 Ignored Feb 16th 2025 Commonwealth Cup Weekend 1
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)