#26 Texas (6-7)

avg: 2128.98  •  sd: 98.52  •  top 16/20: 10.3%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
10 California-San Diego Loss 7-11 2029.08 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
22 Western Washington Loss 8-10 1988.01 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
5 Oregon Loss 7-13 2186.79 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
22 Western Washington Loss 8-9 2125.67 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
15 Victoria Loss 5-8 1917.54 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
18 Brigham Young Win 12-10 2531.44 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
41 Southern California Loss 8-10 1579.49 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
189 LSU** Win 13-1 1255.82 Ignored Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
93 Rice** Win 13-3 1945.62 Ignored Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
46 Texas-Dallas Win 13-2 2422.28 Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
39 California Win 15-11 2248.26 Mar 23rd Womens Centex 2025
25 UCLA Loss 9-12 1788.08 Mar 23rd Womens Centex 2025
46 Texas-Dallas Win 14-6 2422.28 Mar 23rd Womens Centex 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)