#25 UCLA (14-16)

avg: 2133.45  •  sd: 82.28  •  top 16/20: 6.2%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
18 Brigham Young Loss 6-11 1746.62 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
2 Carleton College** Loss 5-13 2398.57 Ignored Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
11 Utah Loss 5-11 1878.8 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
12 California-Santa Cruz Loss 8-9 2352.11 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
8 Washington Loss 6-7 2402.69 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
162 Arizona** Win 12-2 1454.59 Ignored Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
194 Cal State-Long Beach** Win 13-0 1195.6 Ignored Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
104 California-San Diego-B** Win 13-0 1866.85 Ignored Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
166 UCLA-B** Win 13-2 1437.04 Ignored Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
14 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 5-8 1989.49 Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
39 California Win 11-5 2467.09 Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
18 Brigham Young Loss 8-12 1852.16 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
4 Colorado Loss 8-13 2253.47 Feb 15th Presidents Day Invite 2025
1 British Columbia** Loss 4-13 2402.29 Ignored Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
104 California-San Diego-B** Win 13-2 1866.85 Ignored Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
11 Utah Loss 8-10 2216.13 Feb 16th Presidents Day Invite 2025
17 California-Santa Barbara Win 9-6 2722.42 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
13 Stanford Loss 4-13 1875.08 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2025
18 Brigham Young Loss 6-13 1693.32 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
17 California-Santa Barbara Loss 11-12 2178.86 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
46 Texas-Dallas Win 12-8 2263.43 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
8 Washington Loss 5-13 1927.69 Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
39 California Win 9-6 2285.66 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
16 California-Davis Loss 3-8 1706.69 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
147 Boston University** Win 13-2 1579.99 Ignored Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
72 Colorado College Win 10-4 2156.22 Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
238 Texas-B** Win 13-0 681.59 Ignored Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
83 Illinois** Win 15-6 2039.05 Ignored Mar 23rd Womens Centex 2025
26 Texas Win 12-9 2474.34 Mar 23rd Womens Centex 2025
11 Utah Loss 12-15 2178.31 Mar 23rd Womens Centex 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)