#162 Arizona (6-12)

avg: 854.59  •  sd: 66.73  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
115 Arizona State Loss 8-13 699.88 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
175 Colorado-B Win 8-6 1080.12 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
85 Grand Canyon Loss 5-10 857.44 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
98 Denver Loss 8-11 958.08 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
224 Arizona-B Win 11-5 946 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2025
115 Arizona State Loss 5-8 742.43 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2025
194 Cal State-Long Beach Win 8-4 1160.41 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
104 California-San Diego-B Loss 7-8 1141.85 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
166 UCLA-B Win 7-4 1333.2 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
25 UCLA** Loss 2-12 1533.45 Ignored Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
39 California** Loss 3-11 1267.09 Ignored Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
104 California-San Diego-B Loss 4-9 666.85 Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
244 Colorado College-B** Win 15-6 600 Ignored Mar 1st Snow Melt 2025
72 Colorado College** Loss 5-15 956.22 Ignored Mar 1st Snow Melt 2025
98 Denver Loss 3-15 723.68 Mar 1st Snow Melt 2025
177 Colorado Mines Loss 11-13 533.22 Mar 2nd Snow Melt 2025
175 Colorado-B Win 9-8 904.62 Mar 2nd Snow Melt 2025
115 Arizona State Loss 3-15 596.04 Mar 2nd Snow Melt 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)