#91 Arizona (4-8)

avg: 261.67  •  sd: 62.26  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
74 Arizona State Loss 8-13 54.46 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
95 Colorado-B Win 8-6 395.84 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
66 Grand Canyon Loss 5-10 163.28 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
64 Denver Loss 8-11 408.71 Jan 25th New Year Fest 2025
102 Arizona-B Win 11-5 310.65 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2025
74 Arizona State Loss 5-8 97.01 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2025
104 Cal State-Long Beach Win 8-4 229.76 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
77 California-San Diego-B Loss 7-8 375.22 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
97 UCLA-B Win 7-4 467.12 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
27 UCLA** Loss 2-12 719.44 Ignored Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
43 California** Loss 3-11 462.06 Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
77 California-San Diego-B Loss 4-9 -99.78 Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)